Torture is OK if the tortured person is not being punished for his deeds and it’s fine if he is being used to gain information. But torture is not OK for a prisoner who has been convicted of a crime.
Did I get that right?
Oh, and if you don’t like the Bush v Gore decision, get over it!
I’m not over Bush v Gore as its consequences are still with us, but courts have been told not to use the Bush v Gore decision as a precedent for anything.
Have you gotten over it?
From the Indy Star:
The Supreme Court, in a fractured decision, upheld an Indiana law today that requires voters show a photo ID issued by the federal or state government.
“States should have the ability to implement appropriate and constitutional steps to protect their electoral systems from fraud,” Indiana Attorney General Steve Carter said in response. “We can move forward in Indiana with a process that provides constitutional protections to its citizens protecting their vote from potential fraudulent activity.”
It’s funny. When the Indiana voter ID law was first passed, I was one of the original affiants interviewed by the Indiana Civil Liberties Union opposing the new law.
As a case manager for homeless individuals, my thought was that the new law placed an unreasonable burden on homeless people whose ID had been lost or stolen. If you’re homeless and need an ID, it’s likely that you have nothing to prove your identity. To get an ID, the first step is to produce a birth certificate, which you can’t usually get if you don’t have state ID. If you can produce something that identifies you, you’re often charged $20 or more to get the birth certificate, and $20 is something most homeless people don’t have, even if they are drug-free, since you can’t get a job or sell plasma without ID.
The new law made it very difficult for many Hoosier homeless people to vote, and I think that’s a crime, especially since there was no evidence that voter fraud was a problem in Indiana.
So yeah, I’m bothered, but not surprised by the SC ruling.